Comparative study of several microinvasive treatments for large hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE To study the prognosis of large hepatocellular carcinoma after interventional radiology and to compare the efficacy of different microinvasive treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS The clinical data of 46 large hepatocellular carcinoma patients confirmed by clinical treatment or pathological examination were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups (TACE+RFA n=23 cases, and Combination group n=23 cases), according to the treatments method. two groups were followed up for 5-48 months. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the survival curve was compared by log-rank test. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 33 months in both groups. The median survival time in Combination group (n=41 months) was significantly longer than TACE+RFA group (n=33 months) (p = 0.052). Median progress-free survival (PFS) is 10 months in Combination group and 8 months in TACE+RFA group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.023). The tumor inhibition rate was 82.6% and 52.2%, respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.028). The overall survival rate at l, 2 and 3 years was 100%, 95.7% and 55.8% respectively in Combination group was higher than TACE+RFA group at 91.3%, 55.8% and 38.3% respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS For large hepatocellular carcinoma, combined method was superior to TACE+RFA and comprehensive treatment can improve the local-control rate.